NUR 302 Nursing

Discussion: Critiquing Research Designs in the Literature

Understanding the research methods utilized in the literature you are reviewing to support your problem statement, purpose of your study, and that eventually make up your literature review is important to your Doctoral Study. In this week’s Discussion you will review and critique a qualitative, a quantitative, and a mixed methods research article related to your Doctoral Study topic. You will summarize each article and critique the relevance of the research and methodology for your peers.

Topic : Issues and Challenges in Obtaining Surgical Consent from the Patient

Qualitative study

The need of including patients depends upon the decisions of the patients and their care, the moral objective and stresses over ligation and grumblings has said the issue of assent for data and the way it is obtained. All together it is chosen for a patient to settle on a choice for their treatment, they require fitting dialog of the dangers and advantages of the treatment. This review is to investigate specialists' points of view of increasing educated assent for routine surgical methods. Subjective review was finished utilizing semi?structured interviews chosen by purposive examining. Sectionally data were analyzed (Wood et al. 2014).

Quantitative study

All treatment related to surgery is successful. However the proof base for which treatment accomplishes the best result is less in every single disciplines of surgery. Follow up of treatment result requires persistent agree to maintenance of their identifiable and contact information. This study is to manage the capability of patient to wait for a time period of four week. In this all staff from the receptionist were told to prepare a leaflet to gather information and the patients were given a leaflet was given to the patients to fill up their views (Ward, Kassam & Hutchison, 2012).

Mixed method

This study is to portray 'center data sets' which are characterized as a base arrangement of agreement determined data about an offered methodology is discussed with all of the patients. Critically, they are planned to catalyze dialog of subjective significance to people. The theory is that, to begin with, a lot of possibly imperative data are refined down to discrete data areas. These are at that point, where they are evaluated by various iterations, so that center data of concurred significance can be characterized. Our strategies apply efficient audit, subjective, study and accord building procedures to characterize this 'center data' (Main et al. 2017).

References

Main, B. G., McNair, A. G., Huxtable, R., Donovan, J. L., Thomas, S. J., Kinnersley, P., & Blazeby, J. M. (2017). Core information sets for informed consent to surgical interventions: baseline information of importance to patients and clinicians. BMC medical ethics, 18(1), 29.

Ward, M., Kassam, K., & Hutchison, I. (2012). A quantitative study of patient willingness to consent to long-term follow-up. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 50, S28-S29.

Wood, F., Martin, S. M., Carson?Stevens, A., Elwyn, G., Precious, E., & Kinnersley, P. (2014). Doctors’ perspectives of informed consent for non?emergency surgical procedures: a qualitative interview study. Health Expectations.