Last day of the offer FLAT 20% off & $20 sign up bonus
Professionals in health informatics have access to protected health information that requires privacy and security of patients due to their ethical considerations (Lynn, 2007). A professional is obliged towards peers, employers, team, self, association and public regarding autonomy, non-maleficence, justice and beneficence. Key decisions are however based on professional and personal ethics that creates an impact on other groups. One aspect of ethical obligations in professional role concerns principles of autonomy. It includes respect-allowing patients to make their decision according to health care interventions, which they are, going to receive or not (Caulfield, 2008). Focusing on decision situation can lead to problems to focus on importance on patient’s independence. It can divert attention from integral aspects as well as challenges in health care. Autonomy understanding being rational can lead to negative as well as positive implications of social relationship. In this case, it could have led to patients’ preferences regarding treatments and choices. It can create impact on self-evaluations, self-identities and capabilities for emphasizing on independence for facilitating clinical communications (Wolf, 2008). This can in turn undermine patient’s autonomy to understand recognizing value for good patient-professional relationships for enriching specification relating to autonomy.
When a patient takes decision pertaining to himself, I feel I need to guide such outcomes. Without guiding the patient might create decision which has impact on the group, my professional role and on the overall delivery of services. Guiding the patient while taking his decision is my ethical bent of mind for purpose of obliging to professional role in health information.
Caulfield, T. M. (2008). Research ethics recommendations for whole-genome research: consensus statement. PLoS biology, e73.
Lynn, J. B. (2007). The Ethics of Using Quality Improvement Methods in Health CareThe Ethics of Using Quality Improvement Methods in Health Care. Annals of internal medicine, 666-673.
Wolf, S. M. (2008). Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations. The Journal of law, medicine & ethics, 219-248.
No matter how close the deadline is, you will find quick solutions for your urgent assignments.
All assessments are written by experts based on research and credible sources. It also quality-approved by editors and proofreaders.
Our team consists of writers and PhD scholars with profound knowledge in their subject of study and deliver A+ quality solution.
We offer academic help services for a wide array of subjects.
We care about our students and guarantee the best price in the market to help them avail top academic services that fit any budget.
You will receive a confirmation email shortly in your subscribe email address.
You have already subscribed our newsletter.