HISTORY 23 American History I

Restate the result of the treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo. What did the US get? And give?

 

What burning and divisive question did this re-open.

Briefly describe the four proposals for solving that question. Present as two radical and two compromising.

The Guadalupe Hidalgo treaty was agreed in 1848. The treaty had finalized the conformity of $15 million US dollars to the US and 1.36 million square kilometer land to Mexico. The treaty had congested the war amid of America and Mexico. The treaty is the clear stagnant situation where America and Mexico ready to fight in between them for the accession of Texas and the amount of economic conquer that accessed by both nations (Magaloni, Diaz-Cayeros & Romero, 2013).  This attainment and the description of a treaty were ratified by Article 10. The automatic incursions of the region and the circumstances have clogged by the effectual intricacy of two nations.

Burning and Divisive balancing

Cultural standardization and the economic imbalance situation is the correct form that established the right dimension of the war and treaty. The extreme situation has found where the divisive congestion in between two nations and the contemporary approach to both the nations’ were the identical one to state the best policy for the nation (Meed, 2014). The economic stability and the improved land accession have shown the immense need that treated by Mexico and the treaty helped them a much to success the process in an ethical way.

Proposals for the problems

The accession of the problem in the economic point of view and the involvement of such problems in the difficult situation is the high time to express their view over the situation (Meed, 2014). The relative confidence and the conquer overhaul was best slave authority that constructed by the democratic organization of Mexico.

The battle between these two nations highlighted the issue of accession and pointed the illustration of the evasion where the American soldiers are happy to make a treaty that acknowledged by both the countries (Meed, 2014). Political assimilation and Party arrangement crumbled the condition and struggle on behalf of Mexico.   

References

Magaloni, B., Diaz-Cayeros, A. & Romero, V., (2013). The Mexican War on Drugs: Crime and the Limits of Government Persuasion.  ing paper(Working paper)

Meed, D.V., (2014). The Mexican War 1846–1848. Bloomsbury Publishing.